WHEN ONE IS CAUGHT WITH A CRIME, THERE ARE TWO WAYS ROUND THE LAW.
FIRST USE MONEY, GIFTS AND PROSTITUTE TO BRIBE.
SECOND TO CONVERT.
WHEN ONE IS CAUGHT WITH A CRIME, THERE ARE TWO WAYS ROUND THE LAW.
FIRST USE MONEY, GIFTS AND PROSTITUTE TO BRIBE.
SECOND TO CONVERT.
Nurul Noehan Bte Nazari is a mother of 5
Her husband Muzzafar Khalil bin Ramli lost his job during MCO.
She stays at Number 3.4 Block D AUI/b Taman Keramat Permail Flat (PKNS)
Her phone number is 01123848839.
Recently her husband was charged for not wearing a mask.
He is due in court on the 14th April 2021.
Both Nurul and Muzzafar are unemployed.
Both Nurul and Muzzafar have utilities bills to settle.
Both Nurul and Muzzafar have to give up their only daughter because of financial difficulty.
Nurul and Muzzafar are ordinary citizen of Malaysia but due to the mishandling of Covid 19 in the hands of PN Government, they are suffering through no fault of theirs.
I hope that all the Sultans and Agong read this and take note that when the nation is run by useless and corrupted ones, Rakyat stand to lose the most.
WHY IS AGONG PROTECTING MOO AND AZMIN WHILE THE RAKYAT ARE IN DIRE NEED OF HELP?
MALAYSIANS DID NOT VOTE FOR PN YET THEY ARE IN POWER MISUSING THEIR POSITION.
LIKE NURUL AND MUZZAFAR, I WENT TO HELL AND BACK WITH MCO 1 AND MCO 2. THANKS TO THE CHURCH AND FRIENDS I SURVIVED.
HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE LUCKY LIKE ME?
NONE OF THE ABOVE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE HUMAN BEING.
NONE OF THE ABOVE HAVE DIGNITY.
NONE OF THE ABOVE HAVE MORAL.
NONE OF THE ABOVE WORSHIP ALLAH.
NONE OF THEM GOT BALLS AND CUNT.
TODAY EVERY POLITICIANS WORSHIP MONEY AND POWER.
THIS IS THE REASON WHY MALAYSIA HAS GONE DOWN THE DRAIN.
MALAY ARE KILLING THEIR OWN KIND.
SOON THE ABOVE WILL RUN NAKED DOWN THE STREET.
LOOK AT THE CHART CAREFULLY.
EVERYONE IN PN IS A MILLIONAIRE.
TODAY EVEN THE ONES ON TOP OF THE HILL ARE BILLIONAIRES IF NOT TRILLIONAIRE, THANKS TO MOO AND AZMIN.
PROJECTS, LAND, WATER, EPF AND TABUNG HAJI MONEY ARE TAKEN LIKE GIFT FROM GOD.
POLITICIANS NEED NOT HAVE COMMON SENSE OR BUSINESS SKILL.
POLITICIANS ONLY NEED TO BE AYE MEN/WOMEN TO GET HUGE BENEFITS WITHOUT WORKING.
TODAY IN MALAYSIA, MINISTERS AND MPS DO NOT WORK.
INSTEAD THEY STAY AT HOME TO FUCK AND CHAT WITH THEIR LOVERS ALL DAY LONG.
WHILE RAKYAT ARE BEING SCREWED LEFT, RIGHT AND CENTER.
ONLY FOOLS THINK THEY ARE CAPABLE.
ONLY FOOLS BELIEVE THEY ARE GREAT.
ESPECIALLY THOSE FROM PAS..............
The criminal prosecution of blogger Dian Abdullah in Malaysia violates her right to freedom of expression. The American Bar Association Center for Human Rights has been monitoring the proceedings against Abdullah as part of the Clooney Foundation for Justice’s TrialWatch initiative. In June 2020, Abdullah was charged in two instruments with, respectively, “ma[king] statements . . . with intent to cause, or that may cause fear or unrest to the public or to any sections of the public”[2] under Section 505(b) of the Malaysian Penal Code and “consciously ma[king] and commenc[ing] the communication delivery that is abhorrent in nature . . . with intent to offend other people’s feelings”[3] under Section 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act (CMA). The Section 505(b) charge stemmed from a blog post made on March 21, 2020 and the Section 233(1) charge stemmed from a blog post made on March 23, 2020. In both posts, Abdullah criticized the King for his role in appointing a new Prime Minister and criticized the new Prime Minister for allegedly mishandling the COVID-19 pandemic and causing extensive suffering.
Abdullah’s trial commenced on December 22, with the prosecution calling two witnesses from the Police Cyber Response Centre, which monitors Internet posts, blogs, and social media for cyber offenses. The first witness testified that he had read the March 21 blog post and believed it would cause “discomfort” to the Malaysian citizenry but acknowledged that he had not interviewed any citizens about their responses to the post and had not received any complaints about the post. The second witness testified about the March 23 post, stating that he had found some of the terms used in the post to be derogatory and offensive. The trial is set to resume on March 25. The Center is releasing this report prior to the conclusion of the proceedings due to plain violations of international standards on freedom of expression.
The report draws on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), both of which reflect international human rights standards and both of which guarantee the right to freedom of expression.[4] Under such standards, speech regarding matters of public concern warrants heightened protection. The United Nations Human Rights Committee, charged with interpreting the ICCPR, has delineated requirements that States must fulfil to restrict protected speech: restrictions must be provided by law – clear enough to ensure that officials are not afforded unbounded discretion and that individuals are put on notice of what conduct is unlawful; must have a legitimate objective – the protection of public order, national security, public health, public morals, or the rights and reputations of others; and must be necessary and proportional.
In this regard, even when a State invokes an ostensibly legitimate ground for restriction of freedom of expression, “it must demonstrate in specific and individualized fashion the precise nature of the threat, and the necessity and proportionality of the specific action taken, in particular by establishing a direct and immediate connection between the expression and the threat.”[5]
In the present case, Abdullah’s opinions about the transition of power and the government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic constituted protected speech. Indeed, in addressing matters of public concern, her posts warranted heightened protection. As such, in order to lawfully restrict Abdullah’s speech, the State had to comply with the requirements outlined above.
Abdullah’s criminal prosecution, however, is neither necessary nor proportionate. There is no evidence to suggest that her commentary on matters widely discussed in the public sphere warranted criminal prosecution. In particular, the State has not “demonstrate[d] the precise nature of the threat” posed by Abdullah’s blog posts. Instead, the prosecution has relied on cryptic references to “discomfort,” “fear,” and the “offend[ing of] other people’s feelings” without specifying what risk of harm necessitated criminal charges and how Abdullah’s posts were “direct[ly] and immediate[ly] connect[ed]” to this risk.
In light of the above, the prosecution appears aimed not at serving permissible public interest objectives but at stifling criticism of the Perikatan Nasional coalition’s policies, in line with recent measures such as the widely criticized fake news law.
More broadly, the vagueness of the terms used in Section 505(b) of the Malaysian Penal Code and Section 233(1)(a) of the CMA – among other things, the criminalization of statements likely to “cause public mischief” and statements perceived as “obscene, indecent, false, menacing, or offensive in character” – renders both provisions ripe for abuse, affording the State extensive discretion in their application and contravening the requirement that restrictions on freedom of expression be provided by law.
Going forward, in line with international standards, the Kuala Lumpur Criminal Sessions Court should dismiss the charges against or acquit Abdullah, or the prosecution should withdraw the charges. More broadly, the state should cease employing ill-defined laws as political tools against those who criticize the government.
PLEASE CONTINUE READING IN THE LINK BELOW
1 MDB AND 5 MDB HAVE SAME GUARDIAN ANGEL.
Ah Meng was an honest hardworking man.
He worked and saved to buy a house and a car for his wife.
He has 3 kids.
But business was bad so he closed it down.
Ah Meng then went to Johore to work as a tourist guide for the Chinese Market.
Life was good and it looks like Ah Meng hit the gold mine.
Then MCO 1.0 strike.
Ah Meng lost his good income.
Ah Meng then worked in several jobs to earn money to send home.
Since MCO 1.0 he has not seen his family.
MCO 2.0 strike.
Ah Meng lost his job again.
One day he met a friend who told him a Transport Company needed drivers. Desperately in need of an income, Ah Meng decided to give it a try.
Ah Meng told his family the happy news that he found a job with a salary of RM4000.
Filled with excitement Ah Meng started work as a Lorry Driver. He kissed his passport and was looking forward to his first assignment to Singapore.
At the transport company he was handed an assignment sheet to his destination in Singapore.
Ah Meng checked all the papers needed and the condition of the lorry. Since it was his first day on the job Ah Meng did not checked the goods on board. He took it for granted that the Transport Company took careful care in the goods.
Just 15 minutes on the road, he was stopped by the authority in a Rover. He was told to produce all the papers, his Mykad and Driver License. Thinking it was normal, Ah Meng did as was told. Then a man came and told the officers who was talking to Ah Meng that drugs were found. At no time did Ah Meng witness what the other officers were doing while two officers distracted his attention.
Then he was taken in for questioning. At no time questions were asked about the drugs. Instead he was asked how much he had in assets and savings.
Ah Meng contacted his wife and other family members for help and they could only come up with RM2000.
Meanwhile the Transport Company was told to pay RM100,000 within 3 days. The Transport Company could not come up with the money. So the Authorities gave headline news that drugs were found.
Since then Ah Meng has disappeared. No authorities gave any answers to his whereabout and Transport Company continues to operate on the watchful eyes of the authorities.
I am very sad that an honest hardworking man has become a victim for whatever reason.
I am very sad that a wife has lost her husband.
I am very sad that 3 small children have lost their father.
I am very sad that Ah Meng's siblings and aged old parents cannot do anything.
MCO 1.0 and 2.0 has killed a family.
MCO 1.0 and 2.0 has killed hope and inspiration of the citizens.
WHO IS TO BE BLAME FOR SUCH A TRAGEDY IF NOT THE GOVERNMENT WHO HAD NOT MAKE A SINGLE RIGHT MOVE SINCE MARCH 2020 TILL NOW.
WHO IS TO BE BLAME FOR CORRUPTION IN MALAYSIA????
Santhara claims he gained advance approval for this exact period of absence under the ‘Caring Government’ provisions brought in by ‘PM8′.
Conspiracy, conspiracy. That is the hot issue today. Before I start, can you guess WHO STAND TO GAIN OVER THE SOCK ISSUE? EBIT LIEW LOST H...