Section 13 of the CPC imposes a duty on the public to give information about certain crimes that we are aware of.

IGP's Statement Actually Indicates The Video Is Authentic

This is from The Sun:

Mastermind behind viral sex video identified: IGP

14 JUL 2019

1. mastermind behind the production and circulation of sex video identified
said Inspector-General of Police Datuk Seri Abdul Hamid Bador

(OSTB : This is the first giveaway - If the video was a 'Deep Fake' they only need a lap top and some downloaded software to 'fabricate' the Deep Fake. You do not use words like 'behind the production'.)

2. police had made several arrests to facilitate further investigations into case

(OSTB : This is the 2nd giveaway - If the video was a 'Deep Fake' it only needs one or two video fellows with a laptop to make a Deep Fake. They can also be located anywhere in the world.  You do not need some fellow to be physically here in Malaysia to make a Deep Fake video. Sekarang semua boleh buat Online ma.)

He also did not rule out possibility politicians and a NGO involved 

(OSTB : Politician ke, NGO ke - here is the soalan cepu mas - is the video real or fake? Please answer that question first. The rest are all quite not relevant. You can drag the kerbau to the mudhole but you cannot force the kerbau to mandi lumpur. That one only the kerbau can do. So, kalau lah kerbau sudah dengan rela mandi dalam lumpur, why do you want to take the kerbau to the cuci kereta to wash off all that mud? The kerbau mandi lumpur is already in the video.)

focus of investigation is on those involved in production and circulating video 

“we have found evidence of conspiracy and plot (aimed) to topple someone” 

(OSTB : Conspiracy to topple someone is NOT a crime. I do it ALL THE TIME. Its almost a hobby. But how you do it can be a crime.  You CANNOT use illegal, violent or criminal means to topple someone.

But the fruit of a poisonous tree is also poisonous. Meaning, a crime is still a crime - whether sudah kena topple or belum kena topple. 

And in any civilised society "giving information" about a crime by itself cannot be a crime. Instead NOT "giving information" about a crime is a crime. 

Here is Section 13 of the Criminal Procedure Code :

Malaysian Criminal Procedure Code (‘the CPC’). 

Section 13 of the CPC imposes a duty on the public to give information about certain crimes that we are aware of. 

A list of crimes has been listed down under Section 13, and here are some examples:

Waging war against the Agong 

Possessing weapons at a riot 

Murder

Kidnapping or abducting 

Exploiting any person for the purpose of prostitution

Rape 

Incest

Buggery with animal 

Carnal intercourse without consent 

So if a person rapes a girl and you know about it then it becomes a CRIME NOT to "give information"  about the crime.

If a male person engages in homosexual acts / buggery with another male and you know about it then it becomes a CRIME NOT to "give information"  about the crime.

This is as per Section 13 of  the Malaysian Criminal Procedure Code.  

And the law says you cannot plead ignorance of the law. You cannot break the law and say 'I did not know this was against the law'.  (Or that you mistook a bear cub for a puppy.)

And you need not be a lawyer to know the law. Just search Google. 

Hamid said once investigations completed, those involved would be arrested

police recorded statements from several witnesses 

detained those who circulated video

(OSTB : This is giveaway No. 3. Police have "recorded statements from several witnesses".    If the video was a Deep Fake, then what witnesses are we talking about?  What did these witnesses see? 

i.   The receptionist at the hotel in Sandakan. 

ii. The hotel workers, the cleaners who observed the "actors" inside the room, walking in the corridor, etc. 

Were these the witnesses?   So there is NO SUCH THING as a "Deep Fake" video?

Action will also be taken against those involved in viralling the same-sex video. 

We are also in the midst of tracking down those who misused their social media to circulate the video, as well as through their mobile phones,” he said.

OSTB : I repeat,  here is Section 13 of the Criminal Procedure Code :

Malaysian Criminal Procedure Code (‘the CPC’). 

Section 13 of the CPC imposes a duty on the public to give information about certain crimes that we are aware of. 

A list of crimes has been listed down under Section 13, and here are some examples:

Waging war against the Agong 

Possessing weapons at a riot 

Murder

Kidnapping or abducting 

Exploiting any person for the purpose of prostitution

Rape 

Incest

Buggery with animal 

Carnal intercourse without consent 

So if a person rapes a girl and you know about it then it becomes a CRIME NOT to "give information"  about the crime.

If a male person engages in homosexual acts / buggery with another male and you know about it then it becomes a CRIME NOT to "give information"  about the crime.

This is as per Section 13 of  the Malaysian Criminal Procedure Code.  

PKR Youth chief Haziq confessed to being in the video

OSTB :  Please dont tell me the people who distributed / circulated the video via social media will be arrested but the fellow who has already confessed to be one of the "actors" in the video will not be arrested? Tak masuk akal. The fruit of a poisonous tree is also poisonous. 

the case’s investigation papers need to be updated and improved

OSTB :  Please do a thorough job.

Bukit Aman make several trips to Sandakan

to gather more evidence from those involved

it would take quite some time.

OSTB :  This is a dead give away.  So it is certainly NOT a DEEP FAKE video. Otherwise why do the Police need to visit Sandakan so many times, especially to the hotel. Deep Fake videos can be made using a laptop - from anywhere in the world. From your living room, from Hong Kong, from Mumbai or anywhere else in the world. 

The police have to keep visiting Sandakan "to gather more evidence from those involved".   This simple means the events in question did really happen in Sandakan.  There is NO Deep Fake video etc.  

certain actions need to be taken before papers submitted to AG

All those actions upon instructions from AG 

we have submitted papers twice 

authenticity of video, been sent to lab for scientific verification 

it would take some time before the result is known — Bernama

OSTB : This is another dead giveaway. The investigation papers have already been submitted to the AG. 

Meaning the investigations are already completed, including the forensic analysis of that video.  Since this whole incident has been kicked off by that viral video, the authenticity of the video is critical. 

The Police CANNOT submit their investigation papers to the AG WITHOUT the results of the video lab analysis if the video was real or fake. The video has been analysed. 

If the video was fake there is no need to waste time travelling to Sandakan looking for more evidence and interviewing witnesses.  

Everything the IGP has said indicates that the video is real.

Here is the soalan cepu mas - who wants to take the Minister out?

What do I think ?

I fully support the suggestion that Rafidah Aziz be made Senator and Higher Education Minister and then Prime Minister. 

But I am just a blogger. 

Imagine if super powerful people also want the same thing to happen ie Rafidah Aziz becomes our 8th Prime Minister.

Then DVD, CD, pen drive, You Tube? Which one do you prefer?

OutSyed The Box